CompFox AI Summary
The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed certified questions concerning the enforceability of contingency fee contracts between a personal injury plaintiff and his physician. The Court held that contracts for medico-legal expert services or medical treatment, where the fee is contingent on the litigation's outcome, are void as against Tennessee public policy, as reflected in the AMA Code of Ethics and the Tennessee Code of Professional Responsibility. Additionally, the Court determined that quantum meruit recovery is not appropriate in these cases, as it would undermine strong public policies safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process and preventing unprofessional conduct.
Swafford v. Harris is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed certified questions concerning the enforceability of contingency fee contracts between a personal injury plaintiff and his physician. The Court held that contracts for medico-legal expert services or medical treatment, where the fee is contingent on the litigation's outcome, are void as against Tennessee public policy, as reflected in the AMA Code of Ethics and the Tennessee Code of Professional Responsibility. Additionally, the Court determined that quantum meruit recovery is not appropriate in these cases, as it would undermine strong public policies safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process and preventing unprofessional conduct.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.