Home/Case Law/Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

J. Anthony Arena, an attorney, appealed a trial court's decision upholding an agreement requiring him to share 50% of contingency fees if he practiced in Davidson County after leaving his firm, Schulman, LeRoy, and Bennett, P.C. Arena argued the agreement violated Tennessee's public policy against restraints on the practice of law. The appellate court found the agreement's economic disincentive to practice in Davidson County constituted an impermissible restraint on the practice of law, violating Rule 5.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The court reversed the trial court's judgment, deeming the provision unenforceable and denying the firm quantum meruit relief since the firm had an agreement to forego fees if Arena practiced outside the restricted area.

Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

J. Anthony Arena, an attorney, appealed a trial court's decision upholding an agreement requiring him to share 50% of contingency fees if he practiced in Davidson County after leaving his firm, Schulman, LeRoy, and Bennett, P.C. Arena argued the agreement violated Tennessee's public policy against restraints on the practice of law. The appellate court found the agreement's economic disincentive to practice in Davidson County constituted an impermissible restraint on the practice of law, violating Rule 5.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The court reversed the trial court's judgment, deeming the provision unenforceable and denying the firm quantum meruit relief since the firm had an agreement to forego fees if Arena practiced outside the restricted area.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett Case Analysis

Arena v. Schulman, LeRoy & Bennett is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.