Home/Case Law/Hill v. CNA Insurance Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Hill v. CNA Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers’ compensation action, employee Wayne Eldred Hill was determined by the trial court to be permanently and totally disabled. The trial court initially apportioned 10 percent of the award to the employer and 90 percent to the Second Injury Fund, applying Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a). The Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel modified this apportionment, assigning 65 percent to the employer and 35 percent to the Second Injury Fund under Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-208(b). Upon full-court review, the Supreme Court of Tennessee referenced its decision in Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. (Tenn.1998) and concluded that the trial court's original apportionment under § 50-6-208(a) was correct. The Court affirmed the employer's 10 percent liability for the disability resulting from the last compensable injury and the Second Injury Fund's 90 percent liability for prior injuries, effectively reversing the Appeals Panel's modification.

Hill v. CNA Insurance Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers’ compensation action, employee Wayne Eldred Hill was determined by the trial court to be permanently and totally disabled. The trial court initially apportioned 10 percent of the award to the employer and 90 percent to the Second Injury Fund, applying Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a). The Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel modified this apportionment, assigning 65 percent to the employer and 35 percent to the Second Injury Fund under Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-208(b). Upon full-court review, the Supreme Court of Tennessee referenced its decision in Bomely v. Mid-America Corp. (Tenn.1998) and concluded that the trial court's original apportionment under § 50-6-208(a) was correct. The Court affirmed the employer's 10 percent liability for the disability resulting from the last compensable injury and the Second Injury Fund's 90 percent liability for prior injuries, effectively reversing the Appeals Panel's modification.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Hill v. CNA Insurance Co. workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Hill v. CNA Insurance Co. case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Hill v. CNA Insurance Co. Case Analysis

Hill v. CNA Insurance Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.