CompFox AI Summary
This interlocutory appeal addresses whether an employer is liable for workers' compensation benefits when an employee suffers a non-work-related medical emergency and the employer does not use an acquired automated external defibrillator (AED). The court clarified the emergency rule, stating that an employer's duty is to provide reasonable medical assistance, not all possible aid. The ruling concluded that employers have no statutory or common law duty to use an AED to assist an employee, aligning this with existing precedents for businesses and patrons. Consequently, the employer, Team Technologies, Inc., was not found liable for the employee's brain injury, and the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss was reversed.
Katherine D. Chaney v. Team Technologies, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This interlocutory appeal addresses whether an employer is liable for workers' compensation benefits when an employee suffers a non-work-related medical emergency and the employer does not use an acquired automated external defibrillator (AED). The court clarified the "emergency rule," stating that an employer's duty is to provide reasonable medical assistance, not all possible aid. The ruling concluded that employers have no statutory or common law duty to use an AED to assist an employee, aligning this with existing precedents for businesses and patrons. Consequently, the employer, Team Technologies, Inc., was not found liable for the employee's brain injury, and the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss was reversed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.