Home/Case Law/CIPRIANO ALVAREZ vs. MICHAEL TANSY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND
Regular Decision

CIPRIANO ALVAREZ vs. MICHAEL TANSY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND

Filed: Sep 07, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3541262

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. The Board affirmed the original decision but amended it to include a finding that interpreter services were reasonably necessary to determine the validity of the applicant's injury. This amendment clarifies the necessity of these services for establishing the employee's claim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. The Board affirmed the original decision but amended it to include a finding that interpreter services were reasonably necessary to determine the validity of the applicant's injury. This amendment clarifies the necessity of these services for establishing the employee's claim.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CIPRIANO ALVAREZ vs. MICHAEL TANSY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox