Home/Case Law/INOCENTA PALENCIA vs. NESTLE PREPARED FOODS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRemoval

INOCENTA PALENCIA vs. NESTLE PREPARED FOODS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Van Nuys
ADJ10586958

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Inocenta Palencia's workers' compensation claim against Nestle. Palencia filed a Petition for Removal, an extraordinary remedy. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, finding Palencia failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board also determined that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy should an adverse decision be made later.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Inocenta Palencia's workers' compensation claim against Nestle. Palencia filed a Petition for Removal, an extraordinary remedy. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, finding Palencia failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board also determined that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy should an adverse decision be made later.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.