CompFox AI Summary
This case addresses the application of an offset provision in an uninsured motorist (UM) policy to an individual's claim for damages from an automobile accident during employment. Plaintiff Becky Cooper's workers' compensation (WC) claims were settled, including those related to the accident. She then sued the other drivers, serving her UM carrier, Pacific Employers Insurance Company. Pacific Employers successfully moved for partial summary judgment, arguing an offset for WC benefits Cooper was entitled to, even if waived or not expressly received for the accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that a voluntary waiver of workers' compensation benefits does not preclude a UM carrier from reducing benefits by the amount of available compensation. The appellate court exercised its discretion to treat the appeal as an interlocutory appeal under Tenn. R. App. P. 9.
Becky Cooper v. Jason Powers is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case addresses the application of an offset provision in an uninsured motorist (UM) policy to an individual's claim for damages from an automobile accident during employment. Plaintiff Becky Cooper's workers' compensation (WC) claims were settled, including those related to the accident. She then sued the other drivers, serving her UM carrier, Pacific Employers Insurance Company. Pacific Employers successfully moved for partial summary judgment, arguing an offset for WC benefits Cooper was entitled to, even if waived or not expressly received for the accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that a voluntary waiver of workers' compensation benefits does not preclude a UM carrier from reducing benefits by the amount of available compensation. The appellate court exercised its discretion to treat the appeal as an interlocutory appeal under Tenn. R. App. P. 9.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.