Home/Case Law/Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Andrell Dwight, while acting within the scope of her employment with Memorial Hospital, was injured in a minor automobile accident involving an uninsured vehicle. She filed suit against the uninsured driver, Melissa Miller, and her own uninsured motorist insurer, Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company. A jury awarded Dwight $2,500, but the insurer sought to set off workers' compensation benefits available to Dwight, arguing their liability should be reduced. The trial court agreed, limiting the insurer's liability to $281.26, despite Dwight having waived her right to claim workers' compensation. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that the policy's setoff provision for 'benefits available' was valid and Dwight's unilateral waiver did not increase the insurer's contractual obligations.

Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Andrell Dwight, while acting within the scope of her employment with Memorial Hospital, was injured in a minor automobile accident involving an uninsured vehicle. She filed suit against the uninsured driver, Melissa Miller, and her own uninsured motorist insurer, Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company. A jury awarded Dwight $2,500, but the insurer sought to set off workers' compensation benefits available to Dwight, arguing their liability should be reduced. The trial court agreed, limiting the insurer's liability to $281.26, despite Dwight having waived her right to claim workers' compensation. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that the policy's setoff provision for 'benefits available' was valid and Dwight's unilateral waiver did not increase the insurer's contractual obligations.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. Case Analysis

Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.