Home/Case Law/AMAURY TELEMACO vs. PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, VIRGINIA SURETY COMPANY
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

AMAURY TELEMACO vs. PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, VIRGINIA SURETY COMPANY

Filed: Dec 06, 2017
Santa Ana
ADJ9084481

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's finding of no subject matter jurisdiction, acknowledging that the applicant played 19 games in California during his baseball career. However, the Board intends to find that this minimal connection, absent a hiring in California, does not create a substantial and legitimate interest for California to adjudicate the claim under the Johnson due process standard. The Board will allow further briefing on the application of Johnson and the relevant statutory amendment regarding professional athletes.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's finding of no subject matter jurisdiction, acknowledging that the applicant played 19 games in California during his baseball career. However, the Board intends to find that this minimal connection, absent a hiring in California, does not create a substantial and legitimate interest for California to adjudicate the claim under the Johnson due process standard. The Board will allow further briefing on the application of Johnson and the relevant statutory amendment regarding professional athletes.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

AMAURY TELEMACO vs. PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, VIRGINIA SURETY COMPANY (2017) – Santa Ana | CompFox