CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration or removal after discovery was closed and a hearing was set by different judges following a Mandatory Settlement Conference. The Board dismissed the reconsideration petition, finding the order setting the hearing was not a final order. Removal was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and further discovery issues are to be addressed by the assigned judge at the hearing. The Board noted the repeal of a former rule regarding judge reassignment.
CONNIE E. PETERSEN vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, OFFICE OF EDUCATION, PSI is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration or removal after discovery was closed and a hearing was set by different judges following a Mandatory Settlement Conference. The Board dismissed the reconsideration petition, finding the order setting the hearing was not a final order. Removal was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and further discovery issues are to be addressed by the assigned judge at the hearing. The Board noted the repeal of a former rule regarding judge reassignment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.