Home/Case Law/ZENAIDA BALDERAS vs. UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRemoval

ZENAIDA BALDERAS vs. UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Jul 24, 2017
Santa Barbara
ADJ10120415

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Zenaida Balderas's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only when substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result and reconsideration is not an adequate remedy. The Board found that Balderas failed to demonstrate these conditions, adopting the WCJ's reasoning for denial. Therefore, the Petition for Removal was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Zenaida Balderas's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only when substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result and reconsideration is not an adequate remedy. The Board found that Balderas failed to demonstrate these conditions, adopting the WCJ's reasoning for denial. Therefore, the Petition for Removal was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ZENAIDA BALDERAS vs. UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES (2017) – Santa Barbara | CompFox