CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision regarding the applicant's permanent disability rating under the 2005 Schedule, finding the 1997 Schedule inapplicable. However, the Board deferred the issue of the vocational expert's costs, remanding it to the trial level for reconsideration under the newly established reasonable and necessary at the time incurred standard. The validity of the 2005 Schedule itself was not successfully challenged, and the applicant's attempt to rebut its rating was deemed unsuccessful.
ZACHARY RUFFINO vs. VIP CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision regarding the applicant's permanent disability rating under the 2005 Schedule, finding the 1997 Schedule inapplicable. However, the Board deferred the issue of the vocational expert's costs, remanding it to the trial level for reconsideration under the newly established "reasonable and necessary at the time incurred" standard. The validity of the 2005 Schedule itself was not successfully challenged, and the applicant's attempt to rebut its rating was deemed unsuccessful.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.