CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The administrative law judge previously found no industrial injury due to the applicant's trunk, back, legs, or psyche. The applicant's sole piece of evidence, a psychologist's report, was not admitted into evidence because it was neither from a treating physician nor a panel-qualified medical evaluator, violating Labor Code section 4062.2. The Board found no substantial evidence supported the applicant's claim of industrial injury, and the petition failed to address the evidentiary deficiencies.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The administrative law judge previously found no industrial injury due to the applicant's trunk, back, legs, or psyche. The applicant's sole piece of evidence, a psychologist's report, was not admitted into evidence because it was neither from a treating physician nor a panel-qualified medical evaluator, violating Labor Code section 4062.2. The Board found no substantial evidence supported the applicant's claim of industrial injury, and the petition failed to address the evidentiary deficiencies.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.