Home/Case Law/YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH
Regular DecisionReconsideration

YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH

Filed: Dec 01, 2020
San Francisco
ADJ6736069 ADJ6736155

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns applicant Yvette Whitmer's claim for workers' compensation benefits for back injuries allegedly sustained on May 1 and June 13, 2008. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration of its prior decision, which reversed an administrative law judge's finding of compensability. The WCAB found applicant's claims barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10) because they were post-termination claims where the employer lacked prior notice of the injury. The applicant contended she provided notice of an injury on June 13, 2008, by reporting a motor vehicle accident, but the WCAB credited employer testimony that she was not late and did not report an injury until after her termination.

YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns applicant Yvette Whitmer's claim for workers' compensation benefits for back injuries allegedly sustained on May 1 and June 13, 2008. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration of its prior decision, which reversed an administrative law judge's finding of compensability. The WCAB found applicant's claims barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10) because they were post-termination claims where the employer lacked prior notice of the injury. The applicant contended she provided notice of an injury on June 13, 2008, by reporting a motor vehicle accident, but the WCAB credited employer testimony that she was not late and did not report an injury until after her termination.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH Case Analysis

YVETTE WHITMER vs. HI SHEAR CORPORATION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, GOLDEN STATE FOODS, LIBERTY MUTUAL, SANTA BARBARA APPLIED RESEARCH is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.