CompFox AI Summary
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision, amending it to clarify that VRMA continues until applicant meets with a QRR. The court addressed the effect of the repeal of Labor Code section 139.5 on applicant's vocational rehabilitation benefits.
YOLANDA ORTIZ vs. UCSF STANFORD HEALTH CARE, CIGA, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision, amending it to clarify that VRMA continues until applicant meets with a QRR. The court addressed the effect of the repeal of Labor Code section 139.5 on applicant's vocational rehabilitation benefits.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.