Home/Case Law/YOLANDA ORTIZ vs. UCSF STANFORD HEALTH CARE, CIGA, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

YOLANDA ORTIZ vs. UCSF STANFORD HEALTH CARE, CIGA, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES INC.

Filed: Oct 13, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3097538 (SFO 0446365) ADJ2535723 (SFO 0482694)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision, amending it to clarify that VRMA continues until applicant meets with a QRR. The court addressed the effect of the repeal of Labor Code section 139.5 on applicant's vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's decision, amending it to clarify that VRMA continues until applicant meets with a QRR. The court addressed the effect of the repeal of Labor Code section 139.5 on applicant's vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

YOLANDA ORTIZ vs. UCSF STANFORD HEALTH CARE, CIGA, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES INC. (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox