CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the prior decision it sought to review was an interim procedural order, not a final determination of substantive rights. This interim order deferred issues of permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney's fees, allowing for further development of the record. The Board found that clarification of the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on apportionment was necessary in the interests of justice.
YOLANDA MARQUEZ vs. COMP USA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the prior decision it sought to review was an interim procedural order, not a final determination of substantive rights. This interim order deferred issues of permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney's fees, allowing for further development of the record. The Board found that clarification of the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on apportionment was necessary in the interests of justice.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.