Home/Case Law/WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO

Filed: Sep 14, 2022
Anaheim
ADJ7965556; ADJ7965560

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's orders were interlocutory and not final decisions. The WCAB granted the defendant's alternative Petition for Removal, finding that the WCJ's January 19, 2022 orders, which canceled trial and ordered further discovery without an evidentiary record, would cause substantial prejudice. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the WCJ's January 19, 2022 orders and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the decision, emphasizing the applicant's right to due process and a fair hearing.

WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's orders were interlocutory and not final decisions. The WCAB granted the defendant's alternative Petition for Removal, finding that the WCJ's January 19, 2022 orders, which canceled trial and ordered further discovery without an evidentiary record, would cause substantial prejudice. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the WCJ's January 19, 2022 orders and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the decision, emphasizing the applicant's right to due process and a fair hearing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO Case Analysis

WYATT MITCHAM vs. APPSHOSTING, INC., BYUNG SAM YUN, ASHOK BALASUBRAMANIAN, LARRY WENSHAN ZHAO is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.