Home/Case Law/William Spruitenburg vs. Southern California Edison Company
Regular DecisionReconsideration

William Spruitenburg vs. Southern California Edison Company

Filed: Jun 02, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ2894421

CompFox AI Summary

Applicant Spruitenburg sought reconsideration of an order closing the record and reinstating a prior award. The Appeals Board dismissed this petition, finding that the WCJ's orders were not final decisions from which reconsideration could be sought. The Board clarified that Spruitenburg can petition for reconsideration after the WCJ formally reissues the May 2, 2005, Findings and Award. Therefore, the current petition was premature.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Applicant Spruitenburg sought reconsideration of an order closing the record and reinstating a prior award. The Appeals Board dismissed this petition, finding that the WCJ's orders were not final decisions from which reconsideration could be sought. The Board clarified that Spruitenburg can petition for reconsideration after the WCJ formally reissues the May 2, 2005, Findings and Award. Therefore, the current petition was premature.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

William Spruitenburg vs. Southern California Edison Company (2014) – San Francisco | CompFox