CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns William Ross's claim for new and further disability benefits from the City of Sacramento for cumulative trauma injuries. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to amend a previous award. The WCAB found Ross was temporarily totally disabled from March 15, 2005, to June 23, 2005, for treatment of his right shoulder impingement. This period was awarded despite the defendant's arguments that Ross was retired, had no intention to seek work, and delayed treatment. The WCAB determined that Ross's withdrawal from the labor market was due to his industrial injury, entitling him to benefits.
William Ross vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns William Ross's claim for new and further disability benefits from the City of Sacramento for cumulative trauma injuries. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to amend a previous award. The WCAB found Ross was temporarily totally disabled from March 15, 2005, to June 23, 2005, for treatment of his right shoulder impingement. This period was awarded despite the defendant's arguments that Ross was retired, had no intention to seek work, and delayed treatment. The WCAB determined that Ross's withdrawal from the labor market was due to his industrial injury, entitling him to benefits.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.