Home/Case Law/William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMemorandum Opinion

William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez

Filed: Jun 07, 2007
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
2-06-132-CV

CompFox AI Summary

Mary Hernandez, an employee of Calico Corners, sustained a work-related wrist injury and was treated by Dr. William Lowe. Dr. Lowe completed Texas Workers’ Compensation Work Status Reports (WSRs) throughout her recovery. Following a Functional Capacity Examination (FCE), Dr. Lowe mistakenly reported a permanent five-pound lifting restriction for Hernandez instead of fifty pounds, despite the FCE showing she could lift up to fifty pounds for some tasks. Calico Corners terminated Hernandez's employment based on this erroneous permanent restriction, as her job required lifting up to fifty pounds. Hernandez sued Dr. Lowe for negligence, claiming his misreporting and failure to correct the error caused her termination. A jury found Dr. Lowe 100% negligent, awarding Hernandez $179,589 in damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence of Dr. Lowe's negligence and rejecting his arguments regarding expert testimony, contributory negligence, and charge errors.

William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Mary Hernandez, an employee of Calico Corners, sustained a work-related wrist injury and was treated by Dr. William Lowe. Dr. Lowe completed Texas Workers’ Compensation Work Status Reports (WSRs) throughout her recovery. Following a Functional Capacity Examination (FCE), Dr. Lowe mistakenly reported a permanent five-pound lifting restriction for Hernandez instead of fifty pounds, despite the FCE showing she could lift up to fifty pounds for some tasks. Calico Corners terminated Hernandez's employment based on this erroneous permanent restriction, as her job required lifting up to fifty pounds. Hernandez sued Dr. Lowe for negligence, claiming his misreporting and failure to correct the error caused her termination. A jury found Dr. Lowe 100% negligent, awarding Hernandez $179,589 in damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence of Dr. Lowe's negligence and rejecting his arguments regarding expert testimony, contributory negligence, and charge errors.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez Case Analysis

William Lowe, M.D. v. Mary Hernandez is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.