Home/Case Law/WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Dec 04, 2012
Anaheim
ADJ7847706

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in four sentences: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed the trial judge's decision, finding the applicant did not sustain industrial injury. The Board found the applicant not to be a credible witness, citing internal inconsistencies in his testimony and conflicts with medical reports. Furthermore, the medical evidence, particularly Dr. Chanin's reports, was deemed insubstantial due to its reliance on an inaccurate medical history that applicant denied. Consequently, the applicant failed to meet his burden of proof, and his claim for benefits was denied.

WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in four sentences:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed the trial judge's decision, finding the applicant did not sustain industrial injury. The Board found the applicant not to be a credible witness, citing internal inconsistencies in his testimony and conflicts with medical reports. Furthermore, the medical evidence, particularly Dr. Chanin's reports, was deemed insubstantial due to its reliance on an inaccurate medical history that applicant denied. Consequently, the applicant failed to meet his burden of proof, and his claim for benefits was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

WILLIAM CACERES vs. KOOSHAREM CORP., doing business as SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES (SELECT STAFFING), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.