Home/Case Law/WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY

Filed: Aug 15, 2025
Van Nuys District Office
ADJ10266237; ADJ10401171

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company's petition for reconsideration. The defendant challenged the April 22, 2025 Joint Findings of Fact and Order, which found that applicant William Arey sustained industrial injuries to his brain, head, nervous system, and circulatory system. Defendant contended the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) Dr. Roger Bertoldi's report was not substantial medical evidence and that ex parte contact occurred due to applicant's sister's participation in the evaluation. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding Dr. Bertoldi's report to be substantial medical evidence and concluding that the sister's assistance was necessary and permissible due to applicant's significant memory impairment, thus not constituting impermissible ex parte contact.

WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys District Office. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys District Office.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company's petition for reconsideration. The defendant challenged the April 22, 2025 Joint Findings of Fact and Order, which found that applicant William Arey sustained industrial injuries to his brain, head, nervous system, and circulatory system. Defendant contended the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) Dr. Roger Bertoldi's report was not substantial medical evidence and that ex parte contact occurred due to applicant's sister's participation in the evaluation. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding Dr. Bertoldi's report to be substantial medical evidence and concluding that the sister's assistance was necessary and permissible due to applicant's significant memory impairment, thus not constituting impermissible ex parte contact.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY workers compensation case in Van Nuys District Office. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY case law summary from Van Nuys District Office. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY Case Analysis

WILLIAM AREY vs. MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC; HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys District Office. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.