CompFox AI Summary
In Flores v. R & D Cubicle Installation, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The WCAB found that the petition was filed on December 3, 2014, which was more than 25 days after the Workers' Compensation Judge's decision was served on November 4, 2014. California law strictly enforces the jurisdictional deadline of 20 days for filing a petition for reconsideration, with a potential five-day extension for mailing. The WCAB reiterated that the timely filing of such a petition is a jurisdictional requirement, and untimely petitions cannot be granted.
WALTER FLORES vs. R \u0026 D CUBICLE INSTALLATION, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CNA CLAIMPLUS, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in Marina Del Rey. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Marina Del Rey.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Flores v. R & D Cubicle Installation, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The WCAB found that the petition was filed on December 3, 2014, which was more than 25 days after the Workers' Compensation Judge's decision was served on November 4, 2014. California law strictly enforces the jurisdictional deadline of 20 days for filing a petition for reconsideration, with a potential five-day extension for mailing. The WCAB reiterated that the timely filing of such a petition is a jurisdictional requirement, and untimely petitions cannot be granted.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.