Home/Case Law/Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego
En Banc DecisionEn Banc

Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego

Filed: Dec 11, 2003
San Diego
SDO 244774

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board, in an en banc decision, clarifies the burden of proof under Labor Code §3212.1 for cancer claims by firefighters, holding that once exposure to a carcinogen is shown, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove no reasonable link. The prior decision was rescinded and the case returned for re-evaluation under this standard.

Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board, in an en banc decision, clarifies the burden of proof under Labor Code §3212.1 for cancer claims by firefighters, holding that once exposure to a carcinogen is shown, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove no reasonable link. The prior decision was rescinded and the case returned for re-evaluation under this standard.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego workers compensation case in San Diego. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego case law summary from San Diego. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego Case Analysis

Walter Faust vs. City of San Diego is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Diego. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.