Home/Case Law/Walter Centeno vs. PMR Property Services, Inc., State Compensation Insurance Fund
Regular Decision

Walter Centeno vs. PMR Property Services, Inc., State Compensation Insurance Fund

Filed: May 01, 2016
San Francisco
ADJ3722657 (VNO 0537366)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Walter Centeno's petition for reconsideration. The Board found the petition was improperly filed because it sought reconsideration of a non-final, interlocutory order. Such petitions can only be taken from final orders that determine substantive rights or liabilities, or threshold issues. The WCJ's decision in this case did not meet this criteria, leading to the dismissal and an admonishment to the applicant's attorney.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Walter Centeno's petition for reconsideration. The Board found the petition was improperly filed because it sought reconsideration of a non-final, interlocutory order. Such petitions can only be taken from final orders that determine substantive rights or liabilities, or threshold issues. The WCJ's decision in this case did not meet this criteria, leading to the dismissal and an admonishment to the applicant's attorney.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Walter Centeno vs. PMR Property Services, Inc., State Compensation Insurance Fund (2016) – San Francisco | CompFox