CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a worker's compensation claim for an inguinal hernia sustained prior to a layoff. The employer argued the claim was barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10) as it was filed after notice of termination. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the Administrative Law Judge erred by requiring proof of retaliatory intent. The Board rescinded the original finding, concluding the post-termination defense applied as no exceptions under the statute were met. The applicant's claim was therefore barred.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a worker's compensation claim for an inguinal hernia sustained prior to a layoff. The employer argued the claim was barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10) as it was filed after notice of termination. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the Administrative Law Judge erred by requiring proof of retaliatory intent. The Board rescinded the original finding, concluding the post-termination defense applied as no exceptions under the statute were met. The applicant's claim was therefore barred.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.