CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the WCJ's award of retroactive vocational rehabilitation benefits (VRTD) to applicant Vincent Jones. The Board agreed that the Rehabilitation Unit's determination was valid and enforceable, correcting a clerical error in the liability start date. However, the Board rescinded the VRTD rate and earnings determination, remanding these issues to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with a wage-loss calculation approach as established in Gamble.
VINCENT JONES vs. INSPERITY, ADMINISTAFF, PLASTOPAN INDUSTRIES, LUMBERMAN'S INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the WCJ's award of retroactive vocational rehabilitation benefits (VRTD) to applicant Vincent Jones. The Board agreed that the Rehabilitation Unit's determination was valid and enforceable, correcting a clerical error in the liability start date. However, the Board rescinded the VRTD rate and earnings determination, remanding these issues to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with a wage-loss calculation approach as established in Gamble.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.