Home/Case Law/VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER
Regular DecisionReconsideration

VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER

Filed: Dec 14, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3879556 (VNO 0478078) ADJ2327679 (VNO 0478079) ADJ 304183 (VNO 0484721)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCJ's decision regarding attorney fees and penalties is rescinded due to ambiguity and lack of evidence supporting a finding of unreasonable delay in payment. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCJ's decision regarding attorney fees and penalties is rescinded due to ambiguity and lack of evidence supporting a finding of unreasonable delay in payment. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER Case Analysis

VICTORIA BARRAGAN vs. PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.