Home/Case Law/VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

Filed: Apr 02, 2013
Santa Ana
ADJ7598238

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Victor Galvan's petition for reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision. The ALJ found that Galvan failed to meet his burden of proof for industrial causation regarding his alleged injuries. The Board adopted the ALJ's reasoning, which also noted that the petition for reconsideration was untimely filed. Therefore, the Board denied the petition on its merits and on the procedural ground of untimeliness.

VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Victor Galvan's petition for reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision. The ALJ found that Galvan failed to meet his burden of proof for industrial causation regarding his alleged injuries. The Board adopted the ALJ's reasoning, which also noted that the petition for reconsideration was untimely filed. Therefore, the Board denied the petition on its merits and on the procedural ground of untimeliness.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT workers compensation case in Santa Ana. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT case law summary from Santa Ana. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT Case Analysis

VICTOR GALVAN vs. CARL'S JR.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; JDC FOODS dba JACK-IN-THE-BOX, permissibly self-insured through CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION; AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Ana. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.