Home/Case Law/VICENTE JACKSON vs. NORTHRUP GRUMMAN CORPRATION, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

VICENTE JACKSON vs. NORTHRUP GRUMMAN CORPRATION, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Aug 27, 2014
Pomona
ADJ6585876

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns applicant Vicente Jackson's claim for cumulative trauma injury sustained while employed by Vought Aircraft in Georgia and Florida. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's finding of no subject matter jurisdiction. The Board found insufficient evidence that Vought's employment of Jackson constituted a continuation of his original California employment contract with Northrup. Acceptance of a new job offer in Florida from Vought created a new employment contract, superseding any prior California contract.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns applicant Vicente Jackson's claim for cumulative trauma injury sustained while employed by Vought Aircraft in Georgia and Florida. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's finding of no subject matter jurisdiction. The Board found insufficient evidence that Vought's employment of Jackson constituted a continuation of his original California employment contract with Northrup. Acceptance of a new job offer in Florida from Vought created a new employment contract, superseding any prior California contract.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

VICENTE JACKSON vs. NORTHRUP GRUMMAN CORPRATION, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (2014) – Pomona | CompFox