Home/Case Law/VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES
Regular DecisionDisqualification

VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES

Filed: Dec 08, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ409820 ADJ1572678 ADJ3967299 ADJ349576

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant, Veleda Burton, sought to disqualify the administrative law judge (WCJ) presiding over her five consolidated claims. The WCJ denied the petition, finding no stated grounds for disqualification and noting that the request was untimely as an automatic reassignment request. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) adopted the WCJ's report, expressly incorporating its reasoning, and denied the petition for disqualification. The WCAB also concluded the request was untimely under California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 10453.

VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant, Veleda Burton, sought to disqualify the administrative law judge (WCJ) presiding over her five consolidated claims. The WCJ denied the petition, finding no stated grounds for disqualification and noting that the request was untimely as an automatic reassignment request. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) adopted the WCJ's report, expressly incorporating its reasoning, and denied the petition for disqualification. The WCAB also concluded the request was untimely under California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 10453.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES Case Analysis

VELEDA BURTON vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, permissibly self-insured; SEDGWICK CLAIMS SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.