Home/Case Law/URSULA KRAMER vs. MACY'S WEST, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By MACY'S CORPORATE SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

URSULA KRAMER vs. MACY'S WEST, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By MACY'S CORPORATE SERVICES

Filed: Oct 02, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ8911967

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Macy's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award based on a stipulation. Macy's claims mutual mistake of fact and clerical error regarding permanent disability indemnity and attorney fees. The Board denies the petition, finding no mutual mistake and that Macy's error stemmed from a lack of diligence in drafting the stipulation. The Board emphasizes that stipulations are binding unless good cause is shown, which Macy's failed to demonstrate.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Macy's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award based on a stipulation. Macy's claims mutual mistake of fact and clerical error regarding permanent disability indemnity and attorney fees. The Board denies the petition, finding no mutual mistake and that Macy's error stemmed from a lack of diligence in drafting the stipulation. The Board emphasizes that stipulations are binding unless good cause is shown, which Macy's failed to demonstrate.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

URSULA KRAMER vs. MACY'S WEST, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By MACY'S CORPORATE SERVICES ("201) – San Francisco | CompFox