Home/Case Law/United States v. McElheney
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMemorandum and Order

United States v. McElheney

Filed: Sep 27, 2007
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Court File No. 73

CompFox AI Summary

This Memorandum and Order details the Court's reasoning for imposing a 135-month sentence on Dr. Norman Earl McElheney for receiving child pornography. Chief Judge Curtis L. Collier outlined the federal sentencing methodology, adhering to advisory Sentencing Guidelines and considering 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. The defendant, an orthopedic surgeon, was found with numerous child pornography images and videos on his work and home computers and had attempted to obstruct justice. The Court rejected arguments for a downward departure or variance, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense, the need for deterrence, and the protection of the public due to McElheney's assessed moderate to high risk of reoffending, despite his expressed remorse and acceptance of responsibility.

United States v. McElheney is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Memorandum and Order details the Court's reasoning for imposing a 135-month sentence on Dr. Norman Earl McElheney for receiving child pornography. Chief Judge Curtis L. Collier outlined the federal sentencing methodology, adhering to advisory Sentencing Guidelines and considering 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. The defendant, an orthopedic surgeon, was found with numerous child pornography images and videos on his work and home computers and had attempted to obstruct justice. The Court rejected arguments for a downward departure or variance, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense, the need for deterrence, and the protection of the public due to McElheney's assessed moderate to high risk of reoffending, despite his expressed remorse and acceptance of responsibility.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

United States v. McElheney workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

United States v. McElheney case law summary from District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

United States v. McElheney Case Analysis

United States v. McElheney is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.