Home/Case Law/UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED
Regular DecisionReconsideration

UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED

Filed: Oct 27, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ4417162 (VNO 0529182) ADJ1947867 (SBR 0327890)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant's psychological injury claim was barred due to lawful, nondiscriminatory, good-faith personnel actions.

UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant's psychological injury claim was barred due to lawful, nondiscriminatory, good-faith personnel actions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED Case Analysis

UN CHU KO vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.