Home/Case Law/Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger

Court of Appeals of Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Harry Rhodabarger (defendant in error) sued Traders & General Insurance Company (plaintiff in error) in Ward County, Texas, to overturn an Industrial Accident Board award and collect worker's compensation for injuries sustained in August 1933 while employed by Garrett J. Donnelly. Rhodabarger claimed total and permanent disability, seeking $17.30 per week for 401 weeks in a lump sum. The trial court entered judgment for Rhodabarger, awarding $5,561.34, which the insurance company appealed. The appellate court affirmed the decision, addressing evidentiary challenges regarding medical testimony (Dr. Black's reliance on subjective symptoms) and wage calculations (Hill D. Hudson's hearsay testimony), ultimately finding no reversible error. The court also affirmed the insurer's liability due to its prior compensation payments.

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Harry Rhodabarger (defendant in error) sued Traders & General Insurance Company (plaintiff in error) in Ward County, Texas, to overturn an Industrial Accident Board award and collect worker's compensation for injuries sustained in August 1933 while employed by Garrett J. Donnelly. Rhodabarger claimed total and permanent disability, seeking $17.30 per week for 401 weeks in a lump sum. The trial court entered judgment for Rhodabarger, awarding $5,561.34, which the insurance company appealed. The appellate court affirmed the decision, addressing evidentiary challenges regarding medical testimony (Dr. Black's reliance on subjective symptoms) and wage calculations (Hill D. Hudson's hearsay testimony), ultimately finding no reversible error. The court also affirmed the insurer's liability due to its prior compensation payments.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger case law summary from Court of Appeals of Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger Case Analysis

Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.