Home/Case Law/Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND
Regular Decisionnull

Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Feb 23, 2012
Santa Rosa
ADJ7999219

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision finding an applicant sustained an industrial injury to her right shoulder resulting in 8% permanent disability and awarded permanent disability indemnity and future medical treatment. The defendant employer sought a 15% decrease in permanent disability indemnity under Labor Code § 4658(d), arguing they offered the applicant regular work within the statutory timeframe. The Board, relying on City of Sebastopol v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Braga), held that the 15% reduction is not applicable when the employee has not lost any work time and continues in their regular employment. This is because the legislative purpose of § 4658(d) is to incentivize employers to facilitate a return to work, a purpose not served when the employee never left their job.

Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Rosa. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Rosa.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision finding an applicant sustained an industrial injury to her right shoulder resulting in 8% permanent disability and awarded permanent disability indemnity and future medical treatment. The defendant employer sought a 15% decrease in permanent disability indemnity under Labor Code § 4658(d), arguing they offered the applicant regular work within the statutory timeframe. The Board, relying on City of Sebastopol v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Braga), held that the 15% reduction is not applicable when the employee has not lost any work time and continues in their regular employment. This is because the legislative purpose of § 4658(d) is to incentivize employers to facilitate a return to work, a purpose not served when the employee never left their job.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Santa Rosa. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Santa Rosa. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

Tracy Peters vs. CITY OF SEBASTOPOL, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Rosa. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.