Home/Case Law/TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation
Regular DecisionReconsideration

TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation

Filed: Jul 11, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ2646044 (VNO 0494019)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to clarify liability and evidentiary rulings. The Board amended the prior findings to exclude the applicant's deposition transcript as primary evidence and to confirm that Zurich, not the applicant, is liable for injury to upper extremities during its coverage period. Zurich is also ordered to reimburse CIGA for benefits paid for back and neck injuries from January 5, 2000, onward.

TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to clarify liability and evidentiary rulings. The Board amended the prior findings to exclude the applicant's deposition transcript as primary evidence and to confirm that Zurich, not the applicant, is liable for injury to upper extremities during its coverage period. Zurich is also ordered to reimburse CIGA for benefits paid for back and neck injuries from January 5, 2000, onward.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation Case Analysis

TORRIE DOOSE-MARCH vs. BLUE CROSS/WELL POINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC., ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Administered By CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, For FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE, In Liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.