Home/Case Law/TONY PAEZ vs. SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

TONY PAEZ vs. SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Dec 08, 2016
Oakland
ADJ9053858, ADJ9053853

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, overturning the WCJ's prior decision. The WCAB found that the applicant did sustain bladder cancer and a psychiatric injury arising out of and in the course of employment due to exposure to newspaper ink. This finding was primarily based on the consistent medical opinions of the Agreed Medical Examiner in internal medicine. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to ongoing medical treatment, with issues of permanent disability, apportionment, and the EDD lien deferred.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, overturning the WCJ's prior decision. The WCAB found that the applicant did sustain bladder cancer and a psychiatric injury arising out of and in the course of employment due to exposure to newspaper ink. This finding was primarily based on the consistent medical opinions of the Agreed Medical Examiner in internal medicine. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to ongoing medical treatment, with issues of permanent disability, apportionment, and the EDD lien deferred.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

TONY PAEZ vs. SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY (2016) – Oakland | CompFox