CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the prior decision, finding that the defendant waived arguments concerning the panel Qualified Medical Examiner's reports by failing to raise them at trial or cross-examine the doctor. The Board also denied the defendant's request to introduce newly discovered evidence, finding it lacked diligence and specificity. Finally, the Board amended a finding of fact to limit future chiropractic treatment to 24 visits for the injury.
TIOFILO JAIMES vs. CONCORD TOYOTA, TRAVELERS INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the prior decision, finding that the defendant waived arguments concerning the panel Qualified Medical Examiner's reports by failing to raise them at trial or cross-examine the doctor. The Board also denied the defendant's request to introduce newly discovered evidence, finding it lacked diligence and specificity. Finally, the Board amended a finding of fact to limit future chiropractic treatment to 24 visits for the injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.