Home/Case Law/TINA MEDINA vs. THE KROGER COMPANY
Regular DecisionPetition for Reconsideration

TINA MEDINA vs. THE KROGER COMPANY

Filed: Apr 01, 2025
Van Nuys
ADJ957708, ADJ4234122

CompFox AI Summary

Lien Claimant Ronald J. Nolan sought reconsideration of a WCJ's decision awarding him $23,500 of an attorney's fee, granting $500 to prior counsel Robert Blinder, and imposing $1,750 in Labor Code section 5813 sanctions against him for misrepresentation and non-compliance. Nolan contended the fee division was erroneous and the sanctions unjustified. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's Report and Recommendation, finding Nolan's arguments regarding jurisdiction and fee extinguishment frivolous, upholding the WCJ's discretion in trial procedure, and affirming the sanctions due to Nolan's conduct and disregard for court orders. Consequently, Nolan's Petition for Reconsideration was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Lien Claimant Ronald J. Nolan sought reconsideration of a WCJ's decision awarding him $23,500 of an attorney's fee, granting $500 to prior counsel Robert Blinder, and imposing $1,750 in Labor Code section 5813 sanctions against him for misrepresentation and non-compliance. Nolan contended the fee division was erroneous and the sanctions unjustified. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's Report and Recommendation, finding Nolan's arguments regarding jurisdiction and fee extinguishment frivolous, upholding the WCJ's discretion in trial procedure, and affirming the sanctions due to Nolan's conduct and disregard for court orders. Consequently, Nolan's Petition for Reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.