Home/Case Law/Tina Garza vs. County of Kern
Regular DecisionOpinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration

Tina Garza vs. County of Kern

Filed: Nov 03, 2025
Bakersfield
ADJ18724961; ADJ15255319

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant County of Kern sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings of Fact and Discovery Order which determined that Dr. Scott Graham was the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) for both claims and that defendant waived its right to a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) examination. The defendant argued that the waiver finding was improper and they were entitled to a new medical-legal evaluation panel. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter for further proceedings, primarily due to an inadequate record and deficiencies in the minutes of hearing. The Board also noted that based on current Labor Code interpretations, the parties' agreement to an AME once initiated, generally precludes subsequent QME panel requests for submitted issues.

Tina Garza vs. County of Kern is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant County of Kern sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings of Fact and Discovery Order which determined that Dr. Scott Graham was the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) for both claims and that defendant waived its right to a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) examination. The defendant argued that the waiver finding was improper and they were entitled to a new medical-legal evaluation panel. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the matter for further proceedings, primarily due to an inadequate record and deficiencies in the minutes of hearing. The Board also noted that based on current Labor Code interpretations, the parties' agreement to an AME once initiated, generally precludes subsequent QME panel requests for submitted issues.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Tina Garza vs. County of Kern workers compensation case in Bakersfield. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Tina Garza vs. County of Kern case law summary from Bakersfield. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Tina Garza vs. County of Kern Case Analysis

Tina Garza vs. County of Kern is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Bakersfield. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.