CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petitions for reconsideration. The applicant failed to adequately state grounds for error, instead marking all general grounds for reconsideration. The WCJ found the applicant to be an unreliable historian whose claimed injuries at ACV Appraisal were not supported by medical evidence and were contradicted by prior medical records of pre-existing conditions. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which highlighted the applicant's poor credibility and lack of medical evidence linking his current conditions to the alleged employment injury.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petitions for reconsideration. The applicant failed to adequately state grounds for error, instead marking all general grounds for reconsideration. The WCJ found the applicant to be an unreliable historian whose claimed injuries at ACV Appraisal were not supported by medical evidence and were contradicted by prior medical records of pre-existing conditions. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which highlighted the applicant's poor credibility and lack of medical evidence linking his current conditions to the alleged employment injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.