Home/Case Law/THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionInterim Order

THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jan 27, 2015
San Francisco
ADJ3755642 (OAK 0305976) ADJ3452882 (OAK 0305978)

CompFox AI Summary

This is an interim order from the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board correcting a clerical error. The Board's prior Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration, served on December 6, 2015, incorrectly stated the service date. The corrected service date is now January 6, 2015. The case remains pending reconsideration by the Commissioners.

THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This is an interim order from the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board correcting a clerical error. The Board's prior Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration, served on December 6, 2015, incorrectly stated the service date. The corrected service date is now January 6, 2015. The case remains pending reconsideration by the Commissioners.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

THOMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.