Home/Case Law/THERESIA TITTERINGTON vs. O'REILLY AUTO PARTS, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

THERESIA TITTERINGTON vs. O'REILLY AUTO PARTS, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Oct 31, 2013
Sacramento
ADJ7396875

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration. This dismissal occurred because reconsideration can only be sought from a final order, decision, or award that determines substantive rights and liabilities. Interlocutory procedural orders, such as pre-trial rulings on evidence or discovery, are not considered final orders and thus are not subject to reconsideration. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as it addressed a non-final, procedural matter.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration. This dismissal occurred because reconsideration can only be sought from a final order, decision, or award that determines substantive rights and liabilities. Interlocutory procedural orders, such as pre-trial rulings on evidence or discovery, are not considered final orders and thus are not subject to reconsideration. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as it addressed a non-final, procedural matter.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

THERESIA TITTERINGTON vs. O'REILLY AUTO PARTS, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. (2013) – Sacramento | CompFox