Home/Case Law/THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM
Regular DecisionReconsideration

THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM

Filed: Feb 06, 2018
Pomona
ADJ10256712, ADJ10971822

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant, State Compensation Insurance Fund, sought reconsideration of two Stipulations and Awards totaling 60% permanent disability, arguing the intent was to settle for 45% permanent disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition as premature. The WCAB found insufficient admissible evidence in the record to evaluate the defendant's claim of mutual mistake. They recommended the petition be treated as a request to set aside the awards, requiring a hearing for evidence to be presented.

THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM is a workers' compensation case decided in Pomona. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Pomona.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant, State Compensation Insurance Fund, sought reconsideration of two Stipulations and Awards totaling 60% permanent disability, arguing the intent was to settle for 45% permanent disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition as premature. The WCAB found insufficient admissible evidence in the record to evaluate the defendant's claim of mutual mistake. They recommended the petition be treated as a request to set aside the awards, requiring a hearing for evidence to be presented.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM workers compensation case in Pomona. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM case law summary from Pomona. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM Case Analysis

THEODORE YOST vs. LODESTONE PACIFIC INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RETURN TO WORK SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Pomona. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.