Home/Case Law/THEMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

THEMAS OLENHOUSE vs. NESTLE ICE CREAM, SEDGWICK CMS, FRUIT-A-FREEZE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jul 23, 2015
San Francisco
ADJ3755642

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the State Compensation Insurance Fund's (SCIF) petition for reconsideration. SCIF sought to overturn a prior decision that found the applicant's February 23, 2004 injury resulted in permanent and total disability without apportionment to non-industrial factors or a prior injury. The Board affirmed its previous finding, holding that its decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, SCIF's arguments regarding apportionment and the medical evaluator's report were rejected.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the State Compensation Insurance Fund's (SCIF) petition for reconsideration. SCIF sought to overturn a prior decision that found the applicant's February 23, 2004 injury resulted in permanent and total disability without apportionment to non-industrial factors or a prior injury. The Board affirmed its previous finding, holding that its decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, SCIF's arguments regarding apportionment and the medical evaluator's report were rejected.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.