CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns applicant Terry Kirkland's shoulder injury claims against United Parcel Service. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, vacating a prior award based on the finding that the prior medical expert's report was not substantial evidence due to his disbelief in the concept of cumulative injury. The Board ruled that the AME's report from a subsequent claim is admissible in these cases and that the prior stipulations should be set aside. The matter is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine the issues of injury AOE/COE and new and further disability.
TERRY KIRKLAND vs. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in Fresno. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Fresno.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns applicant Terry Kirkland's shoulder injury claims against United Parcel Service. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, vacating a prior award based on the finding that the prior medical expert's report was not substantial evidence due to his disbelief in the concept of cumulative injury. The Board ruled that the AME's report from a subsequent claim is admissible in these cases and that the prior stipulations should be set aside. The matter is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine the issues of injury AOE/COE and new and further disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.