CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration for both applicant and defendant, rescinded the prior Findings and Award, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board found that the medical expert's opinion on permanent disability was not substantial evidence because it relied on an outdated ability to compete in the open labor market standard instead of diminished future earning capacity. Permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees were deferred, with the trial judge to obtain a new medical report consistent with current legal standards. The Board otherwise affirmed the judge's decision, noting that applicant's contentions would be addressed on remand.
TERESA RODEZNO vs. CORONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration for both applicant and defendant, rescinded the prior Findings and Award, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board found that the medical expert's opinion on permanent disability was not substantial evidence because it relied on an outdated "ability to compete in the open labor market" standard instead of diminished future earning capacity. Permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees were deferred, with the trial judge to obtain a new medical report consistent with current legal standards. The Board otherwise affirmed the judge's decision, noting that applicant's contentions would be addressed on remand.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.