CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Teresa Layman's workers' compensation claim against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The applicant's petition for reconsideration was denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, which found a significant flaw in the Qualified Medical Evaluator's opinion. Specifically, the QME improperly combined two identical impairment ratings derived from different AMA Guides chapters, failing to properly apply the Almaraz/Guzman standard. Consequently, the $19%$ permanent disability award, with $60%$ apportionment to the industrial injury, was upheld.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Teresa Layman's workers' compensation claim against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The applicant's petition for reconsideration was denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, which found a significant flaw in the Qualified Medical Evaluator's opinion. Specifically, the QME improperly combined two identical impairment ratings derived from different AMA Guides chapters, failing to properly apply the Almaraz/Guzman standard. Consequently, the $19%$ permanent disability award, with $60%$ apportionment to the industrial injury, was upheld.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.