CompFox AI Summary
Both Defendant and Lien Claimant petitioned for reconsideration of the WCJ's decision. The Defendant argued that costs awarded to the Lien Claimant for appearing on May 12, 2011, were unsubstantiated and that their request to remove the trial from the calendar was made in good faith. The Lien Claimant argued for an earlier start date for penalties and interest due to an alleged EAMS error. The Appeals Board granted both petitions, amending the award to defer the issue of costs for the May 12, 2011 appearance and deferring the effective date of interest accrual, returning the case for further proceedings.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Both Defendant and Lien Claimant petitioned for reconsideration of the WCJ's decision. The Defendant argued that costs awarded to the Lien Claimant for appearing on May 12, 2011, were unsubstantiated and that their request to remove the trial from the calendar was made in good faith. The Lien Claimant argued for an earlier start date for penalties and interest due to an alleged EAMS error. The Appeals Board granted both petitions, amending the award to defer the issue of costs for the May 12, 2011 appearance and deferring the effective date of interest accrual, returning the case for further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.